Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0977

reference
943-tree-1
name
0977
tree-preservation-order

undefined

943-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027100 50.876892)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027015 50.876883,-1.027019 50.876899,-1.027031 50.876914,-1.027049 50.876926,-1.027073 50.876934,-1.027099 50.876937,-1.027126 50.876935,-1.027150 50.876927,-1.027169 50.876916,-1.027181 50.876901,-1.027186 50.876884,-1.027182 50.876867,-1.027170 50.876852,-1.027151 50.876840,-1.027128 50.876832,-1.027101 50.876829,-1.027075 50.876832,-1.027051 50.876839,-1.027032 50.876851,-1.027020 50.876866,-1.027015 50.876883)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL